GOLDMAN SACHS: 3 Reasons Why Investors Should Take US Election Cycles Very Seriously

Img

Voting Ballot Florida Broward County

Some stock market watchers are quick to dismiss correlations to election cycles as spurious. 

However, there are some notable patterns that emerge based on the four-year US election cycle that very much tie elections, economics, and market together.

"As always, past performance is only an incomplete indication of future performance," wrote Goldman Sachs' Jose Ursua in a note to clients. "But certain patterns, especially those that pass a reasonable number of statistical tests, can be useful guides to surfing the electoral wave ahead."

Ursua listed three reasons why investors should take these cycles seriously:

Elections are important market events, for at least three reasons. First, the political stakes in presidential, parliamentary or legislative elections often translate into changes in policies which can reshape the economic environment. Second, the regularity with which elections take place in most countries may give place to cyclical patterns in government and investment behaviour. Third, elections can markedly increase political and social uncertainty. These three factors have the potential to affect all asset classes, especially equities, given their strong sensitivity to changes in the economic outlook.

Here's a quick summary of his findings:

Our results suggest that, in the US, the first two years of the election cycle tend to coincide with lower equity returns than the last two, with the second year particularly volatile. In the run-up to elections, returns tend to move sideways as a reflection of unresolved uncertainty. As uncertainty fades, returns tend to bounce back gradually. We also find that global equity markets tend to reflect the US election cycle, with lower returns in the second year of the cycle and declining volatility thereafter. In particular, the election cycle in the US helps to explain a sizeable fraction of non-US equity returns, both in other developed markets and in emerging markets.

Much of this is well-known.

However, the bit about U.S. elections explaining non-U.S. equity returns is quite interesting.  Ursua provides this chart of R-square results derived from his equity returns regression analysis.  For U.S., developed markets, and emerging markets, equity market returns seem to be much better explained when considering U.S. election-related variables.

Chart

SEE ALSO: The Stock Market Is Telling Us Obama Could Win Re-Election In A 'Landslide' >

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:



Img Tags.bluekaiInsight.adsrvr
Feeds.feedburner
read full article

Latest ArticlesMost Read Articles

For latest CURRENT design & photos
Find Joysco Studio On Facebook


28 February 2012
Be Inspired: The Life of Heavy D (Documentary) FT. QUEEN LATIFAH AND MORE NARRATED BY...
22 March 2015
Last year, Usher and Chris Brown’s budding friendship resulted in the Grammy-nominated single,...
22 March 2015
After dropping his 2014 mixtape Monster and his Beast Mode project in January, Future is back with...
22 March 2015
While a majority of your favorite rappers were performing in Austin, Texas at SXSW, rapper Meek Mill and...
22 March 2015
The “Blurred Lines” case has been a hot topic ever since the Marvin Gaye family won a $7.3...
22 March 2015
Mississippi duo Rae Sremmurd didn’t take the stage at Hype Hotel for SXSW in Austin, Texas on...
22 March 2015
It looks like Nicki Minaj is having a lot of fun on her European leg of the Pinkprint Tour. On Friday...
22 March 2015
Did Rihanna throw a subtle jab at her ex-boyfriend Chris Brown. Well, maybe. While promoting her...
22 March 2015
Kanye West is having a phenomenal year so far, but it looks like some fans want to rain on his parade....
22 March 2015
Spring may be just around the corner, but it’s still a Cole World. After closing out SXSW with an...